| The
Daily Catharsis Monthly, October 2007

"You keep wanting me to move over in bed,
so I'm just expanding on that theme." |
|
|
10-1-07:
<sarcasm>Man, what a bastard! Imagine, asking your significant
other to move over in bed? He should be shot and horse-whipped
and strangled and water-boarded and made to eat his own pubic
hair.</sarcasm>
A good story is said to be built on tension, although why I
bring that up here is anyone's guess.
Oh, yeah, it's because this insipid gag isn't about the bed,
it's about the whole relationship. It might make sense if we
understood the background of the characters but since old Hicky-pants
long ago axed his recurring characters we're left with a suitcase
full of WTF and a duffle bag stuffed with Who Gives a Rat's
Ass?
    |

"Sadly, my computer is down right now. Do
you
people mind if I indulged in a bit of verbal blogging?" |
|
|
10-2-07:
Somebody really needs to send old Hicky-pants a note (Hi,
Bud!) as he must be the last human on Earth who thinks that
the word "blog" is funny in and of itself. That's
the only explanation for this punchline, or the umpteen others
he's written lately which have relied heavily on the b-word
to make his jokes somehow more tragically delicious.
I just did a little basic research and it seems that blogs
officially originated in 1994, so it's clear that Mr. Plaid
Pants has lived the majority of his life free from the oppressive
taint of blogs. And, believe it or not, conversation actually
preceded the internet so "verbal blogging", or "talking"
as we regular people call it, shouldn't be that foreign of
a concept, even to geek-boy.
When you break it down this way it's clear that he could just
have easily bored us with the following:
"My car is in the shop. Would you care if I engaged in
some non-vehicular mobility?"
"My air-conditioner is on the fritz. Does anyone give
a hoot if I choose to perspire?"
"I've run out of Viagra. How much will you charge to
don this chicken costume and let me call you 'Mommy'?"
Heh.
   |

"I'm getting mixed signals here! First, you
say
you never wanna see me again, then you say
you'd like to see other people! Which is it?" |
|
|
10-3-07:
While reading this dismal little jape two words popped into
my head:
"Chinese Zip-A-Tone".
It would explain a lot.
 |

"That's just Bob. He drinks like a fish." |
|
|
10-4-07:
Here's a glimpse into the comic philosophy of old Hicky-pants,
a more or less true story.
On more than one occasion I wrote what was, for me anyways,
the greatest joke in the world. The kind of jape which could
have threatened the very moral fabric of this great country
had it ever seen the light of print.
At least, such was my vain hope.
Except Hick wouldn't use the gag because, as he put it, "it
was too hard to draw".
Yeah, well, so what if the gag involved a dozen diesel-powered,
laminar-flow octochorons and 237 sumo wrestlers dressed as
black-footed ferrets? It was funny, dammit! So, instead, he
would use one of my more harmless contributions, like the
one above, a golden oldie from the late 80's/early 90s.
|
| |
10-5-07:
Old people forget stuff. Huh-huh. How charmingly astute.
I realize no one cares, but if you dissect this scintillating
dialogue what becomes clear is that these two are yet still
conjoined in connubial bliss not in spite of her faulty memory
but because of it.
Gosh, when you look at it that way it's STILL not funny.
Onward.
Normally a memory as bad as hers would be a handicap in a
mature relationship but I can see how this might be of some
comfort as her mate is well past his salad days, which is
a shame as he could obviously use the fiber.
And although the old guy's summation displayed reserved, though
somewhat confused, gentility I'm certain he was considering
the following response: "No, I mean, why am I still married
to someone of such marginal appeal as yourself? What heresies
am I guilty of which have doomed me to this living hell? Mankind
destroyed countless civilizations to ensure that no man should
ever find himself eternally shackled to such a witless, atrophied
cow as you, and if there were truly any mercy in this world
I would have been disembowled by wombats long before the new
millennium."
Hey, somebody had to say it.
Sloth Alert: These moldy-oldies are part of a golden-oldie
as this Quigmans cartoon first appeared way back in January
of 2003.
 |
| |
10-9-07:
I want to go on record encouraging old Hicky-pants to write
more gags like this one. I mean, why waste time writing
effective and possibly amusing punchlines when you can just
let the premise sail into the rhetorical void free of resolution?
This has the double benefit of reducing Hick's strenuous
workload and sparing the general public the time and effort
of deciphering his generally confusing intent. It's win-win,
everybody!
That having been said, a sad clown ensemble seems an odd
choice to gain sympathy from a judge. You'd think that a
puppy costume or some whimsical pirate regalia might have
more beneficial regarding the court's decision but, as is
so often the case, old Hick plays the "glass-half-empty"
card again, dragging the gag from dismal to dreadful to,
well, just sad.
Sloth Alert: This clown has been on appeal for a a very
long time as this gag originally appeared on10-16-02.
 
|

"You can see I made a template of our relationship.
It's fail safe. And here's where I've redesigned
you." |
|
|
10-11-07:
One of the things I like about Star Wars is the efficient
way Yoda uses English. By employing fewer words he actually
enhances and clarifies his message. For example, this is
how Yoda might have narrated the above punchline: "New
template I have. Fail-safe it is. Redesigned you are."
You see the problem, right?
Thanks to the magic of Jedi puppetry it's clear old Hicky-pants
was so focused on his 'punch-line' about the redesign of
Mr. Disposable Male Character he's mutton-headedly made
the template the subject of the adjective, 'fail-safe',
rather than the relationship itself. A more logical Standard
Terran edit of the above dialogue would have been: "I
had trouble templating our relationship but I succeeded
in making it fail-safe once I totally redesigned you."
Yeah, I know. It's not very amusing, but neither is Hick's
original joke, such as it is. But believe me, nothing was
lost in translation. Right, Yoda?
"It is me you are biting."
One final thing... note how Hick's original caption couches
the subject of relationships in a passive voice, quite unlike
my edit which is definitely active-voice. I may be no Dr.
Phil, but perhaps the problem, in this particular instance,
is not a certain someone's general inabilty to formulate
a gag but this certain someone's general inabilty to deal
with relationships.
    
|

"I apologize
for my crude demeanor, but I'm not
used to conversing with a woman offline." |
|
|
10-17-07:
Turning off that special little mental filter, which prevents
a person from blurting out the first thing that comes to
mind, and then proceeding to blurt out the first thing that
comes to mind is not considered conversation. It's a Bush
press conference.
This Quigmans 'joke' sounds a lot like the kind that Woody
Allen would write... if he lacked a sense of humor. That's
not exactly a profound observation but, just for fun, let's
replace old Hicky-pants' punchline with any of the Allen
quips, below, and then compare and contrast. It's the most
fun you'll ever have with a Quigmans cartoon. Trust me.
BTW, for those who find 'Warren Beatty' beyond your frame
of cultural reference simply replace his name with any current
Hollywood horndog like, for instance, 'Orlando Bloom', and
you'll do fine.
"If there is reincarnation, I'd like to come back as
Warren Beatty's fingertips."
"The only time my wife and I had a simultaneous orgasm
was when the judge signed the divorce papers."
And...
“To love is to suffer. To avoid suffering, one must
not love. But then, one suffers from not loving. Therefore,
to love is to suffer; not to love is to suffer; to suffer
is to suffer. To be happy is to love. To be happy, then,
is to suffer, but suffering makes one unhappy. Therefore,
to be happy, one must love or love to suffer or suffer from
too much happiness.”
  
|

"Greetings!
I'm Senator Bilgewater of the House
Appropriations Committee. I'll take the TV!" |
|
|
10-18-07:
Hmmm. He didn't opt for the blond or the painting, he just
wanted control of the media.
Yeah, I'd say old Bilgie's a Republican.
Now, just for the record, let me check my calendar....yup,
it's 2007. So what's with the circa 1965 TV?
Rabbit ears?
Manual tuner?
Atomic design, replete with novel yet unstable pedestal?
If old Hicky-pants is suggesting that today's television
sets are boring, black plastic slabs, then we're on the
same aesthetic page. But if he's truly choosing form over
function, rather than simply resorting to tired cliches,
then I expect to see fins on all the cars from now on. Capiche?
Sloth alert: Hicky-pants gets an "A" for marksmanship
as this Quigmans cartoon originally appeared five years
ago almost to the day. 10-20-02, to be exact.
 
|

"I don't know if we can blame it on
any one thing,
but I'd like to try and I think it's you." |
|
|
10-19-07:
Does it bother anyone else to read a stretch of dialogue,
especially a punchline as lengthy as this one, that's so
painfully devoid of polysyllabic content? Cumulatively,
the words look like nothing so much as the result of a rubber
of Scrabble Jr., as contested by George Bush, the incredible
Hulk and Bizarro Superman. (If you're counting along, that's
two cartoon characters and one atomic scientist.)
Aside from that, I'm curious as to this mysterious 'it'
to which the young lady refers. I'm guessing either the
embarrassment of erectile dysfunction,
the annoyance of middle-age eyebrow droop, or the sad spectacle
of a plaid pants addict.
   
|

"Sorry, we had to return your checks
and charge
you a lot because you didn't have enough after
we charged you a lot for not having enough." |
|
|
10-26-07:
This is not your typical, lousy Quigmans gag...it's one
written by one of Old Hicky-pants' succubi, the sporadically
fecund Hordin, so it's lousy in an entirely different way.
By that I mean, the first half of the gag offers a slice
of life we're all too painfully familiar with, but the second
half paints a dismal picture of one man, or one writer's,
feeble grasp of economics.
Essentially, should we have sympathy for anyone dumb enough
to keep pit bulls in the back yard of a day care center?
Or drives a Pinto in a demolition derby? Or, in this mutton-headed
example, keeps their money in a checking account which charges
unexpectedly high fees? Wanna bet this guy has a sub-prime
mortgage, leases his cars, and has a house full of Rent-a-Center
furniture, too?
(I realize I just insulted about half of you who read this
but tough beans, Pancho.)
    
|

SpongeBob SkinnyJeans |
|
|
10-30-07:
As far as jarring visual spectacles go, SpongeBob LittleBlackCocktailDress
would have been a LotMoreAmusing.
But, seriously, how the hell does it take two people to
come up with one lame gag? I can only envision Gygli and
Rocco, the two credited collaborators, sitting together
in front of their TV one Saturday morning, comfortably attired
in their Aquaman jammies, gobbling away at their ersatz-dollar-store-Koko-Krispy's
from their official "Li'l Commodore's" food-trough,
when suddenly their mother careens through the front door
from a hard night at the docks with a Haitian refugee in
tow, sputtering through her few remaining teeth how he "cleaned
up real nice" before tottering towards the bedroom
where, moments later, the sounds of a possible homicide
ensues, leavened with a sound similar to the ecstatic ululations
of a hundred intoxicated house cats being gutted by a dozen
rusty chainsaws.
Having witnessed this spectacle every day of their lives
the two little waifs hardly glance in her direction as they're
both transfixed by the idealistic fantasy world offered
them by the incessant U.S. Army commercials. When the program
featuring Mr. Squarepants finally resumes their trance is
broken by its hideous banality and they simultaneously cast
for suitable means of unleashing their accumulated, sugar-heightened
aggression. As fate would have it, the local paper is open
to the comic section, and the acrid stench of the Quigmans
comic draws them like flies to an open sewer. Intoxicated
by its sparkling wit the two tots realize it is their civic
duty to share their small slice of life with the rest of
America. Turning over a beer-stained eviction notice, they
tortuously begin to compose their comic opus: "Dear
Mistur Hikkerson; Hears a joak for you to use...."
But I'm just guessing.
    
|

"Let's see... pushing 40 in a family
zone... no marriage
license... ignoring signs of aging... I'm afraid
I'll have
to write you out a ticket to Cosmo." |
|
|
10-31-07:
While all the other good little syndicated comic artists
were entertaining the public with their personal, humorous
spins on Halloween old Hicky-pants presumably yawned, dredged
up another moldy-oldie, and then returned to his urgent
appointment with Judge Judy.
This classic Quigmans cartoon originated in the late 80's,
which is when I wrote this gag. The exact same art has been
syndicated at least four times now, the most recent dates
being 2-15-96 and 11-17-05.
DING-DING-DING-DING-DING-DING!!!!
This month, October of '07, old Hicky-pants set a new record
for sloth as he submitted 15 old Quigmans of his required
27. I take great glee in also pointing out that two of the
new gags were written by collaborators, which means old
Hicky-pants created only ten new gags this month.
So far for this year he's submitted almost 90 old Quigmans.
Would that we could all take 3-month vacations, especially
from a job that requires an hour's time a day, tops.
This is not just half-assing, this is Full... Metal... Ass.
The only comic artist re-using more old material than Buddy
Hickerson these days is Charles Schultz, and Sparky has
a really good reason for taking eternity off.
    
|

 |
=
Possible memes to ridicule |
 |
=
Difficulty of encapsualization |
"The Quigmans"
are copyright ©2007 Buddy Hickerson and the Tribune Media Company
with all rights reserved and all that legal-type stuff. The opinions
expressed here do not reflect those of the authors or owners. Do
I know you??
|