|
 |

| The
Daily Catharsis Monthly, September 2007
|
|
9-1-07:
Yes, it's another agonizing visual pun from old Hicky-pants,
but here's a way to make it funny...
Pretend they're gay... and you don't have to pretend very hard.
So read it again and put a special lisp-y emphasis on the word
"always".
See? Hilariouth. Although, frankly, a bit bawdy for the funny
pages.
Incidentally, while it's clear that the hammerhead character
is anxious, in short order, to have his salad tossed he should
really just come right out and say so instead of beating around
the pelvic fin by adopting this sickeningly cute "handyman"
nonsense.
So it's really no surprise, judging by his annoyed glare, that
the blue shark is apparantly considering chucking "Mr.
Handyman's" protease inhibitors down the nearest loo.
  |
| |
9-3-07:
I don't know why this little mountain is burdening this corporate
Mohammad-ette with his silly questions about chickens and
eggs. His far more relevant concerns should be juvenile diabetes
or teen obesity, and which will kill him first.
 |
| |
9-4-07:
Bob Quigman? Who's that?
Ohhhhhhh, yeahhhhhh, he's the character the Quigmans comic
strip is named after. The same guy who has made only five
appearances in the past four months (think Peanuts with no
Charlie Brown) and in each instance it was in a re-used cartoon.
Old Hicky-pants, better known as the 50 Year Old Sturgeon,
seems to have lost any interest in his sad-sack meal ticket.
Alas, poor Bob. We knew him, Horatio.
Sloth Alert: Yes, this is a repeated gag, too, from 8-6-03.
   |
| |
9-5-07:
Senator Larry Craig couldn't have said it better. (For those
of you reading this in the year 2207....oh, never mind.)
This makes the second Quigmans cartoon this month which has
an undercurrent of saucy homosexuality coursing through its
subtext.
I'm just sayin'.
Sloth Alert: This naughty walrus originally let its knickers
down on 12-13-03.
 |
| |
9-6-07:
This is the quintessential Quigmans gag. It's pointlessly
surreal, senselessly violent, disturbingly misogynistic and,
ultimately, devoid of humor. What really concerns me is that
this is precisely the sort of thing that people leave behind
after they've gone on a shooting spree.
"He was such a quiet boy. He used to mow my lawn. Oh,
if only we'd seen the clues. "
Now if you'll excuse me, I need to get my bullet-proof dickies
out of storage.
     |
| |
9-8-07:
"Yeah, I'll date you, Bob. You're from an old Quigman
which originally ran on 7-9-03."
 
|
| |
9-10-07:
Maybe I need new glasses but I don't see a cat scratcher.
I see a cat post. I see a cat tree. I see a scratching post.
I see a kitty gym, but no cat scratcher. Which is a dang
shame since even cats get itchy now and again.
More interestingly, this is the second consecutive cat-related
Quigman cartoon (the last was from 6-8-07. See below) where
old Hicky-pants has illustrated a male character shamelessly
aping our feline friends. I can only suppose this second
strip is an attempt to mollify the desperate pleas of the
massive Quigman fan-base for more exploits of this peculiar
cat-person. Riiiiight.
 
|
|
| |
9-12-07:
This one was mildly amusing in a "Let's all go feed
our babies to the vicious, wild animals" kind of way,
but it would have been honestly funny if the characters
had simply been people. Drab, boring, faceless little bureaucrats.
Think about it.
Using real dingos, in this case, is the visual equivalent
of kicking someone in the kidneys and bellowing "Get
it? Get it?".
Okay! We
get it! We get it! Hoo-boy.
Sloth Alert: And we're getting it again as this gag was
originally released 12-17-02.
  
|
|
|
9-14-07:
Uh-oh! Looks like Winthrop, the original cat-guy (see 9-10-07,
above) got replaced by Raymond. Evidently Winthrop was just
too much of a pussy.
 
|
| |
9-19-07:
Judge: "You, Mr. Quigman Comic, stand accused of not
being funny in the first degree. How do you plead?"
Quigman Comic: "Guilty as charged, your honor, but
you'll never convict me."
Judge: "How do you mean?"
Quigman Comic: "It's like that old adage of a tree
falling in the forest. If no one reads me then how can you
ever seat a jury with the proper frame of reference?"
Judge: "Point taken. But you'll be back in my court
soon enough and one day, Quigman, I swear I'm going to scour
every mental institution, porn shop, singles bar, anime
group and rocket club until I can find enough misfits, dweebs,
dorks, nerds, geeks and slobs to constitute a jury of your
peers and then, by god, I'm going to throw the book at you.
Now get out of my court!"
Sloth Alert: I see our old friend Mr.
Zip-A-Tone is back, which must mean that, yes, this is another
in a long series of re-used Quigmans. This one's a vintage
specimen from 8-9-03.
 
|

"Am I a performer?
But of course! I'm often called upon to perform
a series of sobriety tests." |
|
|
9-21-07:
This is one of those Quigman cartoons that convinces me that
old Hicky-britches has either suffered a severe head-injury
or he's handed the strip over to some minimum wage art novice
who couldn't cut the syndicated mustard over at the Garfield
Industrial Comic Works.
By this I mean, neither character looks anything like those
typically found in a Quigmans comic. For one thing, old Hicky-pants
never draws classically attractive females, like the one above.
Note the rogues gallery, below, of recent Quig babes as an
example of what I mean. (BTW, I believe all of Hick's women
are blondes because brunettes would require the expense of
valuable time and energy in shading their hair. Those extra
30 seconds can make all the difference in toast and really
crispy toast.) The babe above, with her adorable little ski-slope
honker, is a regular Mary Tyler Moore (Circa 1973) compared
to his usual stable of Joanie Caucus-Redfern clones (Circa
Doonesbury, 1975-2007). |

|
As
for the slob on the right, I hardly have to remind anyone
that males in the Quigman pantheon are hardly models of rugged
comeliness, but this one stands alone in its unique and incomprehensibly
unpleasant appearance. Just scroll through the Catharsis Archive
to see what I mean.
Get well, soon, Hick. It's no fun taking inept menials to
task when it's your sorry butt I'm aiming at.
   |

"It's not quite
as cute when you realize that's her HUSBAND in
the baby sling." |
|
|
9-22-07:
Didn't we just see basically the same joke last
week? Except in the earlier instance the husband was being
carried about by his wife in a small pet cage. Are these sudden
and frequent examples of male emasculation perhaps old Hicky-pant's
ham-handed proto-feminist response to all of the obvious instances
of misogyny he's been littering the Quigs with lately? Huh?
Is it? Huh?
Secondarily, a baby in such a sling would be snugly secured
against its mother's chest. Why, then, would old Hicky-pants
draw the two figures exhibiting such disaffected deportment?
Is there some obscure syndicated rule which forbids the illustration
of a married couple embracing? Or is this simply another case
of old Hicky-pants' raging gynophobia?
Guess which argument I find most convincing? Go on! Guess! |
| |
9-24-07:
From all appearances the officer might ought to have replied:
"Big neolithic deal! Me invent loom, spinning wheel,
sewing machine and mind-fuckingly futuristic tailoring techniques.
And don't even get me started on the animal husbandry required
for the wool, the genetics required for the cotton or the
metalurgy needed for the needles. Now keep those hairy, calloused
knuckles where me can see them, monkey boy, or me will casually
intoduce your suborbital ridges to Mr. Truncheon, me other
clever little invention."
Aside from that, when your best comic gag looks exactly like
a BC comic parody gone sadly awry then perhaps it's time to
reconsider a career in the food service industry.
Hint-hint.
   |

"I can't believe
how cruel I've been to you people.
In all the hubbub I must have outsourced
my soul to India." |
|
|
9-25-07:
This joke is direct from page 93 of "Big Bill Broozy's
Blankety-Blank Book O' Banality for Boys n' Babes".
Here's how it works...you simply think of a premise, say cooking
dinner, and then fill in the blank in the following phrase,
"I must have outsourced my _______ to India." In
this case, a good answer would have been "inability to
digest soy proteins".
See? Fast and simple, and you don't even have to consider
whether it's funny or not. As for the corporate honcho above,
it's unclear how one can outsource something one does not
apparantly possess. Big Bill would not be pleased.
Irony Alert: The writing of this 'joke' is credited to someone
named 'Gygli', which means it's an 'outsourced joke' about
outsourcing. This is referred to as 'unintentional humor'.
It ain't much, but at least it's 'something'.
 |

More feared than
any cowboy, Catboy's lethal
weapon was his ability to rub people the wrong
way. |
|
|
9-26-07:
I've often wondered what the criteria is at Hick Central in
deciding which ancient Quigman cartoon will be unearthed from
its dank crypt, dragged blinking into the harsh light of a
largely uncaring world yet again. Judging by this latest regurgitation,
it falls along the lines of "Whatever gets old Hicky-pants
back to Judge Judy the quickest".
More to the point, if Catboy is a true 'lethal weapon', which
means one that can kill you instead of simply triggering an
allergic reaction, perhaps we ought to use him to execute
prisoners instead of relying on the grotesque inhumanity of
lethal injection. I'm quite certain being rubbed to death
is preferable to being paralyzed and then slowly suffocated
as you feel your heart dance its final, agonizing, myocardial
tango.
Sloth Alert: As noted, this is an oldie but baddie, all the
way from 8-2-03. Old Hicky-pants has been gleaning a lot of
material from 2002-2003 lately so the assumption is that the
maid tossed his earlier stuff out with the rubbish. But who
wouldn't?
   |

"You're very
lucky, my friend. I'm Dr. Scruffy and I originated
the 'licking the wound clean' technique."
|
|
|
9-27-07:
I may not be an expert in such matters but I rather doubt
that anyone will be astonished to discover that a dog could
be professionally accomplished at saliva-based medical treatment.
After all, canines of all stripes and spots have been dutifully
licking themselves ever since they crawled out of the primordial
doghouse, and this includes the very nether-regions only a
Republican senator could love.
However, bipedal locomotion, the ability to speak English
and the proclivity to willingly don surgical attire? That's
pretty darned advanced behavior for a dog, but none of those
capabilities is apparantly as worthy of humorous comment as
the word "licking".
BTW, what happened to the lower half of the two assistants?
More half-assed illustration? (Hah! I kill me!)
Sloth Alert: This 'joke', originally debuting on 5-8-03, has
been subtly altered as the original wording was "We're
not exactly on the cutting edge of surgical techniques here...we're
mostly into licking the wounds clean." Evidently the
key to increased mirth are the words "Dr. Scruffy".
    |

"Check out Skippy's
new trick, son.
I taught him to retrieve a file." |
|
|
9-28-07:
Stay with me here because this can get a bit complicated,
especially for those of you who actually think that the Quigmans
are funny. For that portion of the audience I'll be sure to
type.... real.... slow.
Yesterday's Quigman featured a canine surgeon named "Dr.
Scruffy". (See above) Today's Quigman features another
dog, whose name is "Skippy". But in the initial
version of this gag, which first appeared on December 4, 2003,
the dog retrieving the data was named "Scruffy".
What I'm laboriously describing is that old Hicky-pants changed
"Scruffy" to "Skippy" in this gag because
he thought his audience might actually be paying attention.
First time for everything, I guess.
   |
| |
9-29-07:
Day-in and day-out one of my favorite comic strips is "Bizarro".
It's skillfully drawn, witty, socially responsible and, more
often than not, very wise.
It is therefore everything the Quigmans is not.
Point in fact, this Quigmans comic addresses a very important
subject, that of our commercial media outlets being used as
propaganda tools to benefit both political and industrial
ends...which they have been ever since the end of the Fairness
Doctrine. (Thanks, Reagan, you dink.)
But old Hicky-pants doesn't direct his pointed, editorial
barb at the heart of the culprits, the six monopolists who
own virtually everything we see , hear, or read. He instead
shifts responsibility onto the shoulders of a snack food.
How brave. How inciteful. How...yech!
Even more woeful, while employing this advertising ditty as
a supposed punchline he gets it wrong in the process. The
actual words are "Break me off a piece of that Kit-Kat
bar". "That", not "this". I
hear "that" sort of thing is associated with early-onset
senilty.
You may think I'm splitting hairs but, consider, it'd be like
claiming that the old lady in the Wendy's commercial bellowed
"When's the beef?".
Apart from "that", I'm confused by the alien's plan.
Are they going to destroy the Earth one human at a time using
hand-held weapons? Seems to me we'd outbreed 'em before they
got a hundred miles. And why warn us in advance? Why don't
they just, you know, activate their Death Cruiser Planetary
Destruct-O-Beam and be done with it?
Oh, yeah, it wouldn't be funny "that" way.
     |
 |
=
Possible memes to ridicule |
 |
=
Difficulty of encapsualization |
"The Quigmans" are copyright
©2007 Buddy Hickerson and the Tribune Media Company with all
rights reserved and all that legal stuff. Are you really reading
this?
|
|
|